Andrea Cionci has asked me to publish a new article that is quite frankly shocking. I will let it speak for itself. (Once again this article is an unedited english translation that he supplied).
____________
BERGOGLIO HAS NOT CELEBRATED FOR TWO YEARS: A MATTER OF GNOSIS OR BAN?
"Pope Francis does not read the homily at the Palm Sunday celebration after the proclamation of the Lord's Passion. This is the first time such a thing has ever happened": even the agencies most addicted to mainstream-globalist catatonia raised eyebrows, but that's the least of it.
Perhaps not everyone knows that Bergoglio has not celebrated Mass in public for a very long time. He did not even celebrate on March 28. As the Catholic blog named Silere non possum reports, "this scandalizes many of the faithful (but also priests), especially those who saw St. John Paul II celebrate in far worse conditions than Francis is in."
They would not be scandalized if they finally understood that Bergoglio is not the legitimate pope, given Benedict XVI's impeded seat, but evidently that is too difficult. No matter, we move forward by producing facts and documents.
It took a lot of work to research all of Bergoglio's public Masses and to find that he has not celebrated a Mass since ... April 10, 2022, Palm Sunday.
Just a glance is enough: when the antipope does not celebrate, but presides or, at most, concelebrates, he does not wear the chasuble, a one-piece liturgical vestment, but a wide cloak called a cope, open at the front.
In this video you can see for yourself how long Bergoglio has not been celebrating Mass and how many rich copes he has. While Benedict XVI was referred to as the "vintage pope" because he reused the vestments of previous popes (Pius IX, Benedict XV, John XXIII), the "pauperist" Bergoglio has had dozens (we counted about 30 different ones) of copes made, the cost of which could range, according to a well-known ecclesiastical tailor, from 2,000 to 5,000 euros each.
Among them are some hallucinating ones, such as the one used for the supposedly apostolic trip to Budapest. The logo for the trip was a cross from which a river flows. Oddly enough, the trimmings on the water in Francis' cope take on strange orientations that inevitably make one think of a goat.
For that matter, it is not surprising, considering that he himself, as a good Gnostic, often repeats that "Jesus became a serpent, became the devil."
Now let us think about it: why has Bergoglio, since April 10, 2022, all of a sudden stopped celebrating Mass? Usually he does things gradually, in an overtone way, why this abrupt interruption?
The official excuse is that he suffers from gonalgia in one knee and so it hurts him to stand. However, we know that these health related stories are completely unreliable. We remember when 4-5 different versions were given on his hospitalization, something noted even by the legitimist una cum .
Moreover, as Silere non possumnoted, at the November 2, 2023 Mass, Bergoglio suddenly decided to concelebrate: "The Pope began the Mass as president. He gave the homily [...] The Eucharistic liturgy, however, saw a change of guard. Archbishop Diego Ravelli became the celebrant and the Pope did not do as usual but got up and went to the side of the altar to concelebrate. Now, it is clear that there are no norms that prohibit this. Both are bishops, both enjoy the fullness of the priesthood. But is it appropriate? If the pope has the strength to stand at the altar, why can't he celebrate and have others concelebrate? If your knee hurts, you cannot stand even to concelebrate at the side of the altar."
This is exactly right. As we can see, when he wants to, Bergoglio can stand, all right.
Not to mention all the scripts he has given us, from the pauperist walk down Via del Babuino to change the frames of his glasses (15,000 euros in security expenses) to the laughable affair of his personal photographer who "CASUALLY" happened to be outside the record store to take a picture of him.
Let's not forget the fake live broadcast from Fabio Fazio, unveiled by Bergoglio's own wristwatch that read 5:30 p.m. instead of 8 p.m.
Besides, as we have shown, the Argentine has known since his election that he is not the real pope.
So, one thing is certain: THE OFFICIAL VERSION IS CERTAINLY NOT TO BE TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION.
At this point, there are two different explanations.
1) Gnostics have a so-called "truth obligation," that is, they must be as truthful as possible through gestures, symbols and statements. The massive use of symbols plays a key role both in acquiring preternatural forms of power and in subliminally conditioning the masses with the more or less secret messages conveyed by images and drawings.
How can Bergoglio be a Catholic, given that he does not care in the slightest that he does not have the munus petrino and has occupied the throne of the real impeded pope? If he were a true Catholic pope, he would be DEVOURED by his love for the Eucharist and, like John Paul II, he would celebrate it at all costs, to the last, perhaps aided, supported by clerics, in short, according to his own possibilities.
It is legitimate, therefore, to assume that he avoids as much as possible those sacraments he supposedly does not believe in, which he opposes and has been trying to defuse for some time with the tampering already done in the missal such as the insertion of the dew - nectar of the Roses+cross - in the II Eucharistic Prayer.
However, it is striking how suddenly this decision to stop celebrating Mass has come, forcing, as of April 10, 2022, Vatican cameras and editors to jump through hoops not to frame it during the consecration or other key moments of Mass.
So another possibility looms that, however remote, is plausible and could save the image of the Church, which is currently seriously compromised.
2) First of all, it must be said that the Vatican has very stringent rules to which even the Pope is subject, he cannot do whatever he wants at all, as, from outsiders, one would superficially be led to think.
Suffice it to recall, as an extreme example, how Pope Benedict was forbidden to bring his beloved cats into the Apostolic Apartment.
Recall also Article 3 of Universi Dominici Gregis, which imposes a duty on cardinals to enforce the rights of the Apostolic See. Clergymen are also liable to a whole series of sanctions, incapacitations and censures, among them some that may prohibit them from celebrating the sacraments, all or some of them.
Now, we know from insiders that, in the Vatican, the issue of Pope Benedict's impeded See is an "open secret." Everyone knows about it and it is talked about everywhere in a furtive way. Even the custodi of Castel Gandolfo have confirmed it to us.
Msgr. Viganò argued, on April 5, 2022, on Aldo Maria Valli's blog, "Before discussing the next conclave, it is necessary to shed light on the abdication of Benedict XVI and on the issue of fraud in the 2013 Conclave, which SOON OR SOON MUST GIVE PLACE AN OFFICIAL INVESTIGATION. Should there be evidence of irregularities, the conclave would be null and void, Bergoglio's election null and void, just as all his appointments, acts of government and magisterium would be null and void. A reset that would providentially return us to the status quo ante, with a College of Cardinals composed only of cardinals appointed up to Benedict XVI, ousting all those created since 2013 who are notoriously ultra-progressive."
As you read, it is technically possible to open an investigation into Bergoglio's legitimacy, he is not exempt from the action of the judiciary.
What if this investigation had already been opened long ago, say in 2022?
Certainly we would not hear about it.
Thus, the other possibility could be that Bergoglio is in fact OBLIGATED not to celebrate Mass publicly, or has been "strongly advised" against doing so, by cardinals or by Vatican legal bodies, perhaps because he is involved in internal audits of his legitimacy that we know nothing about.
Entirely plausible that, as a precautionary measure, the Vatican state has forbidden him to perform acts that might constitute very serious scandal and profanation with the Body of Christ.
And so, for Bergoglio, the only possible justification to be served to the people and the media remains that of a sore knee or some other ailment to ditch the celebration altogether.
But no one falls for that anymore.