Andrea Cionci- "Io Sono Impedito": Why Bergoglio is Discrediting Gänswein
A new article by Andrea Cionci
I am republishing another article by the Journalist Andrea Cionci. Just as the last time, this is Cionci’s supplied English translation:
______________________________
The defensive strategy of Bergoglio, by now discovered as an anti-pope, is proving to be increasingly clumsy these days. With studiously centered anticipations from his new book El Sucesor, Tg1 Vaticanist Ignazio Ingrao himself admitted yesterday, at a show anchored by Caterina Balivo, that "Pope Francis is trying to clear away the instrumentalizations" about his illegitimacy."
Let us say that he is not the best person to credibly deny these rumors. In fact, even La Nuova Bussola Quotidiana noted all the contradictory inaccuracies in Bergoglio's reconstruction.
The Bergoglian tactic, however, takes advantage of the complete confiscation of the mainstream media: suffice it to say that our investigative book "Ratzinger Code," which has now reached 112 lectures in a year and a half, upon the invitation of readers themselves, winner of two journalistic prizes and sold 20,000 copies, cited in Corriere della Sera and Sole 24 ore as among the most widely read books in Italy, is TOTALLY CENSORED by the main newspapers and TV channel Never was a sign more indicative.
However, one should not believe a single word Bergoglio says, first of all because he is not the Pope and he has known this very well at least since his election, as we have shown multiple times.
We then saw how he is trying to discredit the Italian cardinals by accusing them of even "using" him in 2005 because they "did not want a foreign pope."
The goal is to intimidate the aforementioned cardinals, who fully know about the impeded See, (also because they were officially informed by our petition, with 14,500 signatures, transposed on November 20 by Secretary of State Parolin) and who, according to Article 3 of Universi Dominici Gregis, can remove him just by saying "vere papa mortuus est," the legitimate Pope is dead.
But the new tranche of advances from the book - shrewdly circulated yesterday - concerns Msgr. Georg Gänswein who is heavily attacked in reference to his volume Nothing but the Truth:
"It caused me great pain," Bergoglio wrote, "that on the day of the funeral a book was published. This turned me upside down, telling things that are not true, this is very sad. Of course it does not affect me, in the sense that it does not affect me. But it hurts me to see that Benedict was used. The book was published on the day of the funeral, and I experienced it as a lack of nobility and humanity."
First lie: the book did not come out on the day of the Pope's funeral, Jan. 5th, but on the 12th.
Second, it is very difficult that such a book had not been approved in advance by Bergoglio himself. We recall how several days before the book's release, pdfs of the book had been strangely massively circulated on the web. The writer himself received copies from ordinary readers, and the fact was confirmed on January 19th, 2023 on Marco Tosatti's blog in an article by Mastro Titta: "I have reliable information about the fact that the print file of the book "Nothing but the truth" is swirling freely in the net, happy as a hummingbird: chats, Telegram groups, emails." .
How come, this circulation of the pdf that, in fact, blatantly goes against the interests of the author and the publisher?
As it happens, in this book there is also a paragraph dedicated to the writer, with a clumsy attempt to discredit him. Suffice it to say that it is claimed that Pope Benedict had kept the white robe because he thought he was going to die soon, that munus and ministerium are synonymous, which is totally disproved by the constitution Pastor Bonus, just remember that Gänswein is a canonist, and he knows it well - and also it is claimed that Pope Benedict celebrated Mass in communion with Francis. This had been unequivocally denied by Gänswein himself just a few months earlier on two separate occasions.
Is it a coincidence that, as revealed by the Catholic newspaper Die Tagespost, Msgr. Genswein had attempted just days earlier to BLOCK THE BOOK'S RELEASE?
Our suspicion is that the volume, transposed in drafts by Bergoglio, was doctored by his entourage precisely to try to defend the antipope.
It is legitimate to assume that the release of the pdf was intended to get a precise message across to journalists, and that Bishop Gänswein, once he realized the tampering, attempted to block the volume's release. But the publisher, responding to "higher will," proceeded anyway.
What is certain is that that holy man Archbishop Gänswein has been Pope Benedict XVI's most faithful servant and, during his nine years as the impeded Pope, has transferred outwardly, in a punctilious and disciplined manner, his messages in broad mental restriction, identified by us and referred to by the easy-to-speak expression "Ratzinger code."
It is clear that, for this reason, Bergoglio fears him and is trying to mangle him media-wise.
Thus, we recall one of Msgr. Gänswein's most blatant services to the real pope: the historic participation at the presentation of Piergiorgio Odifreddi's book at Lumsa.
Greeting the audience, Archbishop Gänswein said, "Pope Benedict first said to me, 'You don't do an institutional greeting, you do a personal greeting from me and say to everyone, 'I did not deserve this illustrious list of presenters.' I told him, 'Holy Father, if I say this they do not believe me, however, I obey'; 'Either believe or not believe, if you do not believe read, either Jeremiah or Isaiah. I don't say which verse and which chapter, but there is the answer.'"
It only took us a few seconds to google it and to hit the jackpot and find the phrase in the book of the prophet, in chapter 36, verse 5:
"So Jeremiah commanded Baruch, "I AM IMPEDED and cannot go into the temple of the Lord."
The Holy Father Benedict, of whom we had been publicly stating for two years that he was in the impeded see, chose from 73 biblical books the only one in which the expression "I am impeded" appears.
But the whole book of Jeremiah hinges on an impeded prophet - that is precisely how he is defined - clausus sum, since at a time of apostasy of the people of Israel he had been thrown into a cistern and communicated with the outside world only through his secretary Baruch.
The other reference is to Isaiah, where the theme recurs of a prisoner - again - being set free and putting away his persecutors.
Why is Bishop Gänswein still not speaking clearly? Going into the logic of the Holy Father Benedict XVI, he probably received a mandate to continue to speak in restrictio mentalis, so that it is God's people who understand and rise up.
Everything is clear: anyone who has retained a bit of lucidity realizes that these days Bergoglio is pumping the mainstream to the max with this narrative. But it is too late now.
A desperate swan song for the Gnostic antipope, who is now at great risk.